Today, let’s talk about the age-old question: Should we have a live band or DJ for the wedding? Okay, it might not be up there with “to be or not to be?” but it’s definitely a question most couples come across during their wedding planning.
Related: What to Do When You’re Fed Up With Wedding Planning
For some, it’s an easy answer, as they know
exactly what kind of music and entertainment they want. But for many couples,
the answer isn’t so clear cut. Both options come with their pros and cons, so
it really comes down to which is the best fit for your wedding.
To help uncover the answer you can ask
yourself some questions:
- What vibe do we want to set?
- What does the venue allow?
- What is our budget?
- What would our guests enjoy?
- What kind of music fits our style?
PROS A LIVE BAND
Pro: A live band provides not only music, but a performance, making it a
unique experience for you and your guests.
Pro: Band members are able to “feel the room,” play to the crowd, and
interact with the guests.
Pro: A live band provides entertainment for both the people on the dance
floor and those sitting back and watching.
Pro: Certain kinds of music just sound better live, so depending on the songs you want played, a live band might pull them off better.
CONS OF A LIVE BAND
Con: Live bands generally cost more. Factors that can affect the fees are
the number of band members, set up and take down time, the day of the
Con: A live band may take up more space, so you’ll need to consider your
Con: A live band will likely be louder than a DJ (with little volume
control), so check your venue for noise restrictions. Also keep in mind your
guests, as they may not be the kind of crowd who wants to yell over a band.
Con: Bands have a set repertoire and can only play what they know
(obviously), so you may not get to hear all the requested songs and the songs
that are played won’t sound exactly like the original version.
PROS OF A DJ
Pro: A DJ takes up less space and is generally more mobile, so they can
easily transfer between cocktail hour and reception, if need be.
Pro: A DJ has a much larger song repertoire, so the chances of hearing
whatever song is requested are high. Plus, the songs will sound exactly like
the original version.
Pro: DJs are generally less expensive than live bands.
Pro: A DJ will need less breaks, if any, than a live band.
CONS OF A DJ
Con: Although good DJs can set the mood and keep the party going, they are
not as equipped to improvise or play to the crowd as a live band would.
Con: There is less of a wow factor with a DJ.
Con: A DJ may crack weird jokes, have horrible emcee skills (get names
wrong, for example), or have a rotten personality – all of which can really
kill the mood.
YOU SIGN ON THE DOTTED LINE:
- Make sure the band or DJ can play
your requested songs (like the first dance).
- See the band or DJ live/watch a
recording, read reviews, and meet in person to gauge personality and
- Provide the DJ or band with a list
of must-play songs, as well as absolute no-gos, and make sure they are on board
with your requests.
In the end, there is no right or wrong answer. What you choose depends on the kind of entertainment that suits your style, budget, venue, etc. And if you just can’t decide, consider hiring both if your budget allows: a live band/string quartet for the ceremony or cocktail hour and a DJ for the reception.
Related: How Much to Tip Wedding Vendors
Looking for an Austin, Texas based band or DJ for your wedding? I’ve worked with several that I can highly recommend!